The Objects of Houghton Library: Past, Present and Future. A lecture by Ann Blair

0 Comment

Welcome. I am Tom Hyry. I’m the Florence Fearrington Librarian of
Houghton Library and the Director of Arts and Special Collections of the Harvard College
Library. And I have to tell you, it’s an incredible
thrill to have you all here tonight. We’ve had this date circled on our calendar
for months, and we’re really excited that it’s finally here. As most or all of you will know, we have been
celebrating Houghton’s 75th anniversary throughout the year. And this semester already we’ve had events
focused on faculty, on students, on staff, and many others. And we see tonight’s events as pulling the
whole thing together for a true anniversary celebration. It’s highly fitting to have Ann Blair with
us here tonight to deliver the George Parker Winship lecture. The Winship lecture is named after the famed
bookman George Parker Winship, and it was established by the John Barnard Associates
in 1966 to celebrate broadly the history of the book, bibliography, and their intersections
with rare book libraries and special collections. Afterwards, we invite you all over to Houghton
Library for a reception, a final opportunity to see the spectacular exhibition, HIST 75H,
a Master Class on Houghton Library. And most importantly, for the launch of our
new publication, Houghton Library at 75, a celebration of its collections. To start us off this evening, we’ve invited
Sarah Thomas to offer a few remarks. Sarah is the Roy E. Larsen Librarian for the
Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Vice President for the Harvard Library, and University Librarian. Sarah has been a remarkably strong supporter
of Houghton Library and the other special collections and archives on campus, and I
feel fortunate to be able to turn things over to her. [APPLAUSE] Thank you. Thank you so much. I really add my welcome to you. It’s wonderful to be here. We have, as Tom said, have anticipated this
such a long time. Now one of my predecessors was Keyes Metcalf
who was a librarian of Harvard from the 30s into the– I don’t know– actually now, 57,
or something like that. And he lived to a very great age. But I’ve had fun looking at some of his annual
reports where he’s anticipating the need, and seems to be– It’s always very humbling, actually, to be
the head of a library. And then you look at and you think you’re
encountering these issues– for you it feels like the first time. But actually, all of my predecessors are always
railing about how there is not enough space. And Widener Library, which just celebrated
its 100th anniversary in 2015, was– although thought to be for the ages, and one looks
at it and it’s enormous, of course, it was outgrowing its space. And in the 30s, Metcalf was already hatching
this idea of what he would do to alleviate those space pressures. And we see in Houghton Library, celebrating
its 75th, and in Lamont Library, actually two of his plans that came to fruition. And I do want to say that he was partnering
then with one of Tom’s predecessors William Jackson who was– I would say that I often
feel like I’m the administrator. I’m solving those problems of space, and money,
and personnel. But then you need someone with great vision. And I think Jackson brought to this opportunity
enormous vision and also the ability to help conjure up the funds to make it happen. And I was imagining, as I was thinking about
today, what it feels like as someone– For me, when I was first married and you’re anticipating
that day that you will have children and then you’re pregnant and you’re reading all those
baby books about how you will bring up this child, they were doing that. They were planning this building. They were anticipating. You have all the excitement that leads up,
and then one day, those doors open. And you have that opportunity. When you’re holding that infant in your arms,
you’re imagining all the futures that lie ahead for that child. And Houghton has lived through so many of
those futures. Now I think my analogy is going to break down
a bit here because at 75, and those of us who are getting closer to 75, we feel those
creeks sometimes in our bones– But I think that what happens unlike a human, the building
continues to move ahead. When you think of a university such as Harvard,
which is deep into its fourth century, we know that we are not just looking at the past
of this building and all the lives it’s touched– the people who built it, the people who worked
in it, the people who came and researched in it, the collections that have grown with
it. But we are looking ahead to multiple futures
over many years, quadruple those 75 years, I would say. So I feel at this moment– It’s interesting
to look at Babar there and think of a children’s book, Babar coming to Houghton. And I feel that we are both celebrating the
long past of Houghton Library but, even more with excitement, looking forward to its future
as it will build under Tom’s leadership, under the colleagues, many of whom are here today,
and then our successors, who will continue to solve the problems of space, the problems
of money, the problems of all the administrative aspects, but then the grand challenges of
life and what is the role of a special collections library in the 21st century. We have many opportunities ahead of us, and
I hope you will join me in celebrating them today. Thank you. [APPLAUSE] Thank you, Sarah. Back to me. So when considering the grand sweep of history
documented in the holdings of Houghton Library, the 75 years may not seem like all that long
of a time, and even at Harvard, a 75th anniversary may not seem as impressive as some others. So it’s important to remind ourselves that
what we’re celebrating tonight is the opening of what was then a state of the art facility
dedicated to preserving cultural heritage, producing new scholarship, and educating students
through the acquisition, preservation, and study of rare books and manuscripts. Thinking on a grander scale, the opening of
a library can be traced back to the earliest days of the university when the clergyman
John Harvard bequeathed the gift of 400 books to the university, which was named in his
honor. The story of the naming of the university
highlights the centrality and necessity of books and, by extension, the library to Harvard. It also set a precedent of generosity that
has lived on through centuries at Harvard as each generation has seen sons, daughters,
and friends of the university follow in John Harvard’s footsteps, committing their own
books, their collections, and resources to the library. Tonight we celebrate this tradition, and we
remember Arthur Houghton, Jr. whose tremendous act of generosity allowed Houghton Library
to be built. And we’re fortunate to have some members of
the Houghton family here with us tonight, so we welcome you. We are also thankful that this tradition extends
to this very day. And I want to offer my deepest gratitude to
the many donors and supporters of Houghton and Harvard Library, especially those of whom
we have with us here this evening. The opening of Houghton Library on February
28th of 1942 that we celebrate tonight was fundamentally an act of optimism. That date was less than three months removed
from the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and the newspapers and newsreels carried difficult
news from the war in the Pacific and in Europe on a daily basis. Harvard was in the midst of a transformation
in which most of its curriculum and research agenda would become dedicated to wartime concerns. By the end of the war, more than 27,000 students,
alumni, faculty, and staff would serve in the armed forces, and almost 700 would die. In that setting, the university staged a relatively
modest ceremony to open and dedicate the library at which President James Conant and Arthur
Houghton spoke briefly. Referencing the war, Houghton spoke of the
responsibility of safeguarding education in its broadest and most liberal sense. The preservation of the records of scholarship
and of truth will make it possible to bring forth a more enlightened civilization in the
peace that will follow war. Conant called the founding of the library
“an act of peace in time of war” and concluded his remarks by invoking the ancient duty of
a company of scholars to cherish the creative spirit of mankind and treasure those things,
which the world will not willingly let die. So I have been quoting from these remarks
liberally throughout the winter and spring for inspiration and because we continue to
feel the responsibility and duty so wonderfully articulated by our predecessors. Today, we would speak of humankind and be
sure to define the concept of scholars ecumenically to include librarians, archivists, students,
donors, and other friends passionate about our mission. But we still understand our own work is building
links in a long chain of custodians that stretches backward and forward through time, doing our
part and our best to make sure our cultural heritage can be preserved and understood for
generations to come. As we think back upon Houghton Library 75
years, we can confidently state that we have lived up to the faith in mission on which
this library was founded. Houghton has grown tremendously in these 75
years, attracting collections of rare books, manuscripts, archives, and many other materials
of astonishing quality and quantity. More importantly, these collections and our
brilliant and dedicated staff have facilitated the pursuit in discovery of knowledge in a
diverse and numerous array of disciplines and contributed to the education of countless
students. As much as we appreciate our past, anniversaries
ought not to be about nostalgia but, more importantly, the opportunity to consider critically
our current moment and our future. Today, we find ourselves in a moment of unease
in which many of us sense a kind of existential threat to the values of Houghton, Harvard,
and the country as we’ve known it. Education, in its most broad and liberal sense
as Arthur Houghton put it, feels imperiled. Within the University, and higher education
in general, we hear narratives about the decline of the humanities. More often than we like, we field flippant
questions about why libraries are even necessary in the age of Google, the smartphone, and
the many other technologies that continue to change how we create, store, exchange,
and preserve knowledge and information. So though this backdrop presents serious challenges,
like our predecessors, I am filled with optimism about the future of Houghton and Harvard Library,
which we are well-positioned to have an expanded impact on the university and for the public
good. We look to seize the opportunities afforded
by new technologies to connect scholars, students, and others to the collections of the libraries
as never before and to support new types of research and teaching that answer questions
formerly too complex to even ask. At the same time, we remain committed to the
physical objects of books, manuscripts, and so much more. This commitment grows in significance as we
have an increasingly disembodied relationship to what we read, view, and consume. The ability to connect with physical artifacts,
drawn from around the world and surviving decades, centuries, and even millennia, gives
us an enhanced understanding of our own existential nature. So let us take Houghton’s 75th anniversary
as an occasion for renewal, reinvigoration, and rededication, valuing the pursuit of knowledge
and truth, fostering critical thinking and understanding of the past, encouraging inquiry
and discovery, and welcoming others to join us in preserving a diverse cultural heritage. We have the perfect speaker to help us with
this task tonight. Ann Blair is the Carl H. Pforzheimer University
Professor of History here at Harvard University and was our top choice to give a lecture this
evening on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of Houghton Library for many reasons. Most importantly, her scholarship has helped
us ground the work of contemporary libraries and librarians in historical precedent. Ann is simply one of the greatest historians
of the book working today. And we are incredibly fortunate to have her
here at Harvard. Ah, but Ann’s connection with Houghton in
particular is a special one. Ann worked at Houghton while an undergraduate,
retrieving materials for researchers. And in fact, I am told that she is the original
stack girl. Here’s the truth. Ann still works at Houghton. Her teaching and researching bring her to
the library regularly, and I cannot imagine a faculty member more generous of her time
and energy on behalf of Houghton and the library at Harvard in general. Ann’s kindness and generosity are only outmatched
by her brilliance. Her lecture tonight is titled– The Objects
of Houghton Library, Past, Present, and Future. And I ask you to join me in welcoming her
tonight. [APPLAUSE] Thank you so much. It’s really a thrill to be here. Some of you may have been here for the 50th
and more for the 25th. I’m honored to be here for the 75th. Thank you so much for coming. I’d like to take the opportunity, following
on the wonderful comments of both Sarah and Tom, to reflect on what Houghton Library is,
has been, and we trust will long continue to be, and on the nature of libraries more
generally. A library is a place. A library is people. A library is, of course, books and all those
other objects it’s there to preserve and make accessible. And finally, a library is a set of objects
in the sense of goals, which motivate all the investments of resources made in the place,
the people, and the physical objects. We are at a time of change, and not all libraries
have fared very well. This on the upper left is the History Department
Library, which now houses a Foosball, and I think it’s doing very well as a lounge space
for graduate students. Houghton Library, on the other hand, is playing
a bigger and bigger role every day in the educational mission of the college and the
university, hosting students in direct contact with the amazing objects in these collections. As others have mentioned, Houghton is an award
winning building, designed by the Boston firm Perry, Shaw, and Hepburn, which opened in
1942, as the first library of its kind in the US that is dedicated to rare books and
manuscripts with special attention to security and climate control needs. And one motivation was to offload Widener,
which although it had only been founded 25 years earlier, had already filled its 50 plus
miles of shelf space, filling up faster than expected. So Houghton’s earliest holdings came from
the Treasure Room in Widener and from the stacks there. And then, of course, it immediately grew due
to generous bequests, such as that of Arthur Houghton, Jr. of the Class of 1929, who also
funded the building itself, and Philip Hofer of the Class of 1921, who was also Curator
of Printing and Graphic Arts. And, of course, Houghton also pursued an ambitious
acquisitions policy. So it soon was full up and started expanding
underground on the basement levels of Pusey and Lamont for a total of six miles of shelving. The building hasn’t changed much since 1942,
as you can see. And it has lovely rooms, fancy rooms inside,
which don’t often get viewed. I highly recommend the tour. I think Thursdays at 3, Fridays at 3, something
like that. Fridays at 2. Thank you. The Richardson Room, the Hyde Room, the Reading
Room, and then I won’t show you a picture of the Edison and Newman Room because you’ll
all be going there shortly to visit the exhibit. This is one change to the building since the
50th, which was removing the bridge 2004, and I’m very grateful to members of the staff
for finding this lone picture of the interior of the bridge. It was a time when these card catalog drawers
seemed no longer necessary, and that’s what filled the bridge. I am told that these card catalog drawers
have not disappeared. They’ve gone to depository, so they can be
called up. And indeed in the back spaces of Houghton,
there are still other smaller card catalogs. So some change physically, but the biggest
change, surely, in the last 25 years, is that Houghton inhabits a whole new kind of space
on the World Wide Web. Houghton is a Twitter account, Instagram,
Facebook accounts, each with thousands of followers, 5 blogs, a Tumblr feed. And you have to see this. This is an item that you’ll see on exhibit–
the giant folio, which is beautifully prepared with so-called volvelles. These are cut out of paper, hand-colored,
and stuck around a piece of string. You won’t be able to turn said volvelles in
this Apian Astronomicum Caesareum in the exhibit. But you can see how this digital rendering
of how it turns is a valuable tool in teaching astronomy basically in the 16th century. And then it’s also an Ask-Me feature. And, of course, many thousands– I don’t have
an exact count. I was told it was pending– of fully and partially
digitized books and manuscripts, freely available on HOLLIS to anyone with an internet connection,
sometimes even with notes and bibliographies. And these new resources are lasting achievements
that result from major investments of efforts over the last years. And I hope we, and generations to come, will
continue to maintain them and add to them to use them and enjoy them. I think the web often seems like it has substituted
itself. It’s made things less personal. But actually, in terms of library access,
I think the web is a fascinating way for people to meet the people behind-the-scenes in the
library. And if you use the comment function, you will
get an answer. If you use the Ask-Me function, you will get
an answer. And it’s a wonderful way to realize that Houghton
Library is people, fantastic people– catalogers, curators, conservators, bibliographers, librarians,
45 staff members of amazing skill, expertise, dedication who are always eager to help researchers
and students. So here I have a novel way of representing
the staff of Houghton Library. I’ll invite you to try and find John Harvard
who has a different lower body than the others. But since it’s slightly difficult, I will
point him out to you along with a few other people whom I’d especially like to thank because
much of the information behind these statistics comes from people inside Houghton Library
who know much more than I do about it. I can’t think of a library of this importance,
which is as accessible and friendly as Houghton Library. I vividly remember one European colleague
commenting a few years ago that working in the manuscript room of his own home university
was compliziert– complicated. It was meant to make me feel good about the
difficulties I was having in negotiating my way through the institution, but above all,
it was a powerful reminder of how fortunate we are not only to have a library with amazing
holdings but also amazing librarians who routinely go far beyond anything one could reasonably
expect to make materials available to us as directly and as easily as possible. Houghton has become a huge attraction to Harvard
courses. In 2016, Houghton welcomed 2,868 students
in 283 classes. These ranged from courses in math and computer
science– which are what one wouldn’t expect, and here are the selections that the colleagues
involved in those courses, which are on exhibit– from government, and, of course, from the
humanities and the histories. Mainly from Harvard but not exclusively, they
also host classes from Boston-area schools. And that’s a tremendous extra workload that
Houghton staff absorb, but everyone seems to have embraced this expanding role with
great enthusiasm. The tours are great, too, but these sessions
are really hands-on in a seminar room around the objects themselves. These are the oldest things that you or I
or our students will probably ever get so close to. These sessions resonate vividly with students
who mentioned they’re the best part of a course or even the best part of their whole Harvard
experience. And they create an immediate connection, sometimes
to a distant past but also to not such distant past. The students are amazed to see telegrams or
typescripts, for example, which are distant for them, too. And as a result, students every year fall
in love with some aspect of book culture. And they go on to become book professionals,
among them James Capobianco, Class of 1999, who is now a reference librarian at Houghton
and responsible for the Houghton history 75H, which is so realistic a depiction of a Harvard
class that as the DUS in history actually sent around a little note to everyone, explaining,
this wasn’t a real Harvard class. If anybody came along being confused, they
should disabuse them of that. Or Robert Darnton, one of the luminaries in
the field of book history, our own University Librarian, 2007 to ’15, who remembers as a
freshman, walking into Houghton Library– that’s for James and staff favorites coming
soon, I’m told, mid-May, it sounds like. Here is Robert Darnton’s selection for the
exhibit you’ll see. He describes, as a freshmen, coming into Houghton
and reading, looking at Melville’s copy of Emerson’s Essays and noting this annotation
by a rather grumpy Melville to this line, which is starred, in which Emerson wrote,
the drover, “the sailor buffeted all day, and his health renews itself as vigorous a
pulse under the sleet as under the sun of June.” Melville’s comment– “To one whose weathered
Cape Horn is a common sailor, what stuff all this is.” So he remembered that many years later when
the opportunity presented. Who knows what our current undergraduates
will go on to do? I know some who’ve gone off to be book artists
and book restorers. I’m delighted that one senior I know who is
concentrating in statistics and is going off to work at Google will have been into Houghton
and really have a sense of the long history of the codex form thanks to Houghton’s accessibility. Some of them are also lucky to have summer
fellowships at Houghton Library. It’s a wonderful new program, which brings
on 5 or 6 students every summer to work on a range of topics that are of interest to
the libraries from James John Audubon’s drawings, for example, to fanzines, fanfiction of the
1970s. Houghton is people, therefore. But, of course, Houghton is books and related
objects. These are the items that Houghton is here
to safeguard and transmit but also to showcase and provide access to. We call them books, but, of course, they take
many forms. Here is Kathleen Coleman’s favorite papyrus. You can notice that it’s by a Greek orator,
Isocrates, from the fifth century. And this copy is from approximately 600 years
later. It has, of course, not survived very well,
papyrus being a medium that, barring exceptional circumstances like being in a jar in the Dead
Sea caves, doesn’t come along very well more than a few hundred years. There are other kinds of scrolls, too, though,
on parchment like this lovely genealogy of Christ, French 13th century, which was on
display at the Beyond Words exhibit that you may have seen during the fall semester in
the Boston area, not just at Houghton but also at Boston College and in the Isabella
Stewart Gardner Museum. Other things that you’ll notice, this is a
piece of advertisement on a blotter, which was not a medium I was aware of. But I gather that it was meant to be the underside
of a rocking blotter, and presumably, you were supposed to tip your blotter on its side
so that you’d be able to be entranced by the advertisement lying underneath it. Obviously, this is the kind of ephemera that
is very rare and valuable today because, at the time, it was a throwaway item. Another such of piece of ephemera that started
off as an ephemera is this wanted poster seeking the assassins of Abraham Lincoln. But it’s been turned into memento after the
fact by the addition of those cartes de visite of the three perpetrators, so you can see
that it acquired commercial value as a memento close to the time. Obviously, Houghton Library has long collected
items of great beauty. Here is a sequence from the Mass copied by
nuns in 14th century Westphalia. Of great significance, here’s a manuscript
of Keats’ Ode to Autumn. You can see the poet at work revising. And here is another item of beauty, a special
limited edition print with hand painting so numbered copies 1 through 50. But our libraries treat equally carefully
items, which actually seemed of no importance at the time they were acquired when they were
bequeathed to the institution. And I especially like this item with an accompanying
letter in which Grosvenor Hubbard, a descendant of Jonathan Trumbull from the Class of 1727,
is writing to the Harvard College librarian in 1909– I send you a notebook with scribblings
by Jonathan Trumbull. It has, of course, no value except as a curiosity. And by the standards of 1909, that makes good
sense. What it is is a notebook taken down by a student
of Aristotelian natural philosophy, basically. There are a few dozen such notebooks in various
collections in Massachusetts, so it’s not unique for the content that it carries. And intellectually, it’s probably not terribly
original or interesting. But 100 years after the donation to someone
like me who’s interested in the pedagogy and methods of working in note-taking, this is
fantastic. And actually, I’m relying on the scholarship
of two scholars who have studied all of the surviving such notebooks and found out that
basically they were not taken by dictation, as it would be expected in a European setting,
that the students would copy out section by section, as assigned over the course of about
two months, their textbook here in natural philosophy. So we can learn a tremendous amount about
what actually happened in the classroom thanks to this having been preserved for us even
though, at the time, it seemed kind of boring. And I have to say there are items in Houghton
now, which I– well, here’s some notebooks, more of the kind. And you can see how each student individualizes
them. Some of them have colophons like this in Latin–
you see most of the text is in English, in fact– or adding an index or table of contents. So there’s a way of personalizing your work. It’s also a time when with a very small class
size, it didn’t make sense financially to print this book because you’d have to spend
50 years selling it by dribs and drabs to 10 students a year. But also the act of writing it out was considered
pedagogically valuable. Now these are some items from Houghton’s Z-Closet. And I think they are going to await a different
historian than I. They await scholarly the attention. But objects are patient that way as long as
they have a safe haven like Houghton Library, which will keep them until they’re called
up. And here is something classed as a manuscript,
which is a piece of the house in which William Caxton printed his first book in England in
1471. So Houghton has many, many goodies, objects
in addition to books. These objects, of course, can prove more durable
than people or even institutions. The place is 75 years old, and the people,
who are generally younger, are dwarfed in age by many of the objects in Houghton Library. How have they come down to us? They were saved by their first owners and
immediate heirs of those first owners like the Harvard notebook, for example, came down
through the family directly to the library. We also see here the case of a professorial
Nachlass the scrap book of Charles Eliot Norton, Professor of Art History, includes a letter
in which a student is praising his stand he took in class against the Spanish-American
War. But the other way that books entered Houghton
Library was passing through a market. Sometimes the market has some downsides. It encourages the creation of forgeries in
the hope that they will fetch money. And this is a wonderfully interesting selection. It is a late 18th century facsimile of forged,
completely fake manuscripts that were purported to be Shakespeare’s and, particularly here,
a love letter. And you can see the making of the facsimile
was in itself a huge feat, including the rendering of a lock of hair using engraving techniques. So it was, of course, very rapidly debunked,
and yet, it is an object of interest and value today as an example of early facsimile work. The market has a lot of virtues ensuring the
survival of many items, which might have been discarded otherwise. Americans travel to Europe to buy books, which
is, of course, what Harry Elkins Widener was doing in London when he returned and drowned
in the Titanic. European dealers came to the US to find buyers
here. And of course, objects considered of value
have traveled and been bought at a distance. They travel across time and space, and when
that object contains words, it’s more likely to end up in a library than a museum. But in fact, these distinctions are porous. And there are books in museums, and there
are nontextual things in libraries. But my point here is that institutions play
a key role in the preservation of books, and they have done so for centuries. A few libraries have existed continuously
since the Middle Ages, but many more have existed continuously since the 16th and 17th
century. So if you could get something into a library
then, it can have safe passage down to the present. And Harvard’s library should rank, of course,
among those 17th century libraries. Although there is really only one book, we
think, that has survived the fire of 1764. And here it is. I called it up. It comes in a beautiful red box, and it is
an example of the reverse phenomenon, of a book that was checked out at the time clearly
of interest a good 130 years after its publication in which, nonetheless, now does not seem that
appealing to a scholar like me to go read about the Christian Warfare against the Devil
World and Flesh. It’s a very large folio, and I hope someone
embraces it. But books will be saved nonetheless and, in
any case, for a long time to come. So I’d like to think a bit with you about
what makes a book and/or a text durable. Some items are durable because of their material
form. Big books survive much better than small ones,
and the Gutenberg Bible was probably printed in about 150 copies of which there are 29
surviving copies. That is a fantastic record of survival. On the other hand, this is an indulgence. You can see its print meant to be cut into
four. You can see on the verso, there are two indulgences,
and here there are two indulgences. And this would make four indulgences, and
you can see here that it is meant to be filled in by hand with your name after you’d purchased
it. This would be proof that you had just purchased
some time off purgatory, bluntly put. This kind of thing survives very little at
rates of about 0.02%, a few hundred copies out of maybe a million printed by 1500. And so printing helps us understand why Luther
was so agitated with the flooding of indulgences, which had existed in the Middle Ages, too,
but just not in this incredible quantity. Some books survive not because of their content,
so these are tiny bibles, 13mos that were meant to be in a lady’s pocket. And I was just had a talk at the Renaissance
Society of America, explaining that many of these editions of the Bible– which of course,
don’t have any scholarly value, were never considered of importance– only survive because
of the bindings were made for them, which are, of course, beautiful embroidered and
keepsakes that were kept and passed down from mother to daughter and even, I learned, down
the male line, also. So here the text is saved by accident because
of the binding. Similar example, the oldest object in the
collection is an Anglo-Saxon 10th century page from a benedictional, which survived
only because it was included in the end papers of the binding of a later manuscript. So then we have a tension between our wanting
to see the 10th century page and yet, of course, also valuing that original binding from the
later Middle Ages. But I think the 10th century won out on this
one, but we try to keep a record of the bindings as they were before they’re disbound. And books are durable things. They can survive damage. So here, for example, is a Ben Jonson’s copy
of Lucretius annotated, and then apparently, ink was spilled on it. And the ink sort of burned through the paper
and creates a paper burn, which is nonetheless still an object that has come down to us so
signs of use and abuse. So that’s how books survive materially. But in fact, some of our oldest texts do not
survive materially. Except for inscriptions on stone or on clay
tablets, texts from antiquity, whether they are biblical or classical, owe their survival
not to material durability– because those papyrus rolls really don’t do well– but instead
to cultural longevity. The text of the Bible, of ancient Greece and
Rome, that have come down to us were those that were central to a religious, or a pedagogical,
or general literary canon. And that canonical status ensured that they
were copied over and over again like the Isocrates that 600 years after he wrote we have a papyrus
fragment. And ultimately, the ones that got copied onto
parchment in late antiquity with the rise of the codex are the ones that have come down
to us. Once inscribed in parchment, which is quite
durable, the text could survive a few centuries of neglect, which is what befell many ancient
texts and even some of the biblical ones that were not in regular use. So when those texts were rediscovered in the
Renaissance, there was enough cultural continuity, in fact, to make the recovery rather easy. They could turn to Byzantines to help with
the Greek language. The Roman alphabet and the Greek alphabet
was pretty much similar. And they had maintained the use of Latin. They were eager to learn. They had the cultural motivation to admire
the ancient texts they were recovering. So basically this process of recovery was
not very onerous. But when there isn’t cultural continuity,
interpreting long lost texts is much more fraught. You need to decipher the writing system, master
the language, interpret the text, contextualize it. And text can travel alone through time and
space without cultural continuity to accompany them. So the Maya petroglyphs would be an extreme
example. The stone inscriptions are doing fine, and
we have no clue how to read them. We don’t have the cultural legacy with which
to understand them. Texts from foreign cultures require special
skills in cultural understanding to read and interpret them, and Houghton, although centered
on American and European materials, also has abundant collections in non-western materials. Here’s an Ottoman manuscript. And you can see all this is from our wonderful
new Mirador system whereby you can flip through the books and you can also download the entire
thing, very powerful. And here, for example, in Houghton, we even
have this Chinese imprint, which was the work of a Jesuit missionary who’s writing a conversion
manual for Chinese consumption, which is in Houghton rather than the Yenching Library
where we might expect it. So a library like Houghton collects and preserves
not only items that are clearly central to our cultural heritage, whether we want to
think of that as American or English speaking, but also items that now seem culturally distant
because of chronological or geographical distance. And the university is that place where we
develop and transmit the specialized skills for conserving, understanding, and interpreting
these sources of all kinds, requiring the expertise of librarians and techniques like
paper-making, or binding, or past cataloging, to academic departments, which treat the languages
and cultural context of many different times and places. So together libraries and universities are
trying to transmit to the future physical and cultural access to as much of the heritage
of human culture as we can. So texts are made more durable by redundancy,
right, the creation of multiple copies. Each individual copy is at risk of loss. But the more copies you have, the better the
chance of survival. Oh yeah, where’s my Horace? Oh, well. Let me talk a bit about– Well, so lots of redundant copying ensured
that Horace’s line, that I have written something that will outlast the pyramids of Egypt, Ode
330, has actually come true, not because we have what he wrote but because he has become
central to the teaching of Latin for 2000 years minus about a 400 year period there
between the 5th and the 9th centuries. But he was safe on parchment somewhere. And the Latin transmitted despite that. So that’s one way you can have durability. Sometimes the multiple copies only one survived
to be read, and that’s probably what happened to Lucretius. Only one copy was found in a German monastery
in 1417 as beautifully told by Stephen Greenblatt’s The Swerve and then put back into circulation. And of course, there were many ancient works
that we know existed that don’t survive at all. Maybe parchment copies were made, but they
don’t come down to us. For example, Aristotle’s book of the poetics
on comedy And Umberto Eco’s book and movie of the same title– The Name of the Rose–
makes a plot point of how that text might have become destroyed. Estimates of how much ancient literature have
survived range from about 1%, which was the estimate made by humanists, in particular,
Pietro Bembo in the 15th century, to about 4%, which is the recent estimate of a classics
scholar studying the survival of ancient plays. So then you’d say, well, printing, which began
in 1453, is going to solve all these problems of preservation. To be commercially viable, a print run has
to be at least 300 copies. By the 16th century, it’s normally a 1,000
copies. Even though the survival rate for printed
books seems to be not that much greater than 1% on average because to offset the Gutenberg
Bible that survives at a rate of 30%, we have lots of cheap print that doesn’t survive that
well. And that’s what this slide is about. Aristotle’s complete masterpiece– we have
here the 21st edition in 1738. And we have these other editions. But between the 25th and the 31st, we certainly
cannot account for every single missing edition. What’s happened here? Either this is like a x-million hamburgers
sold kind of advertisement. It’s possible. But more likely, simply, this work, which
was borderline obscene in the eyes of the educated at the time, which was very lowbrow,
was not considered of sufficient value to ever end up in an institutional library. Because printing alone does not carry books
down to the future, it needs printing plus a library. Similarly, my selection for the exhibit is
writing tablets, which combine print with these pages of hardened paper that you can
write on, which we found a handful of examples. Now that Peter Stallybrass has made us aware
of these, we may find more of them. But basically, it’s a very functional object,
which is not collected until much later, and then anything old has some value. So basically, these cases are good reminders
that even though the concept of a legal deposit library was present by the early 17th century
in both France and England, clearly it was not effective. And there are many kinds of books that just
don’t make it into institutional libraries. So I’d want to end with talking about libraries
and to turn to an author on whom I’ve been working lately. Oh, there’s Horace’s Odes. Sorry, misplaced. But we move on to Conrad Gessner who we celebrated
500th of his birth last year. He’s a humanist, naturalist, bibliographer,
physician in 16th century Zurich, a prolific author of 65 publications, many of them massive
folios, and a great dedicator. Out of the 65 books, he manages to get 102
dedications. How does he do that? He takes pieces of a book, and he dedicates
different parts to different people to get extra mileage. And then he will use dedications to multiple
people, so he has 127 individual dedicatees plus 6 institutions. These are universities or city councils. So his first major work is this Bibliotheca
Universalis, a kind of virtual library. It’s often hailed as the first modern bibliography. It’s trying to be exhaustive, a catalog of
all authors in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, extant and not, ancient and not, learned and not,
published and hiding in libraries that is, in manuscript, waiting to be hunted down. He’s a late humanist. There aren’t that many manuscripts left, you
know. The good stuff’s already been printed. And he did managed to score a few editiones
princeps. It’s not completely modern. It’s organized by first name, which seems
bizarre to us. But it provides an index from last name to
first name. If you know Luther, you get Martin that way. It’s not completely exhaustive, and it has
some personal touches– a long autobibliography where he lists his own works. And in particular, he gives shout outs to
works he wants to write and tries to invite people to fund him to write his Natural History
of Animals, for example. He also includes a few of his friends who
hadn’t actually published anything in the relevant languages, but he wants to thank
them and, in particular, for access to their library. So the Bibliotheca is an amazingly ambitious
project taken on by a 26-year-old. It took him three years, and he listed 10,000
works by 3,000 authors, comparing the experience, quote, “to having climbed the tallest steepest
mountain.” He starts with a dedication, of course. That’s one of the points of publishing a book. It’s a dedication to Leonard Beck von Beckenstein,
imperial counselor. And it starts with fulsome praise, of course,
for the dedicatee, including this colored rendition of his coat of arms. But really what his point is that is the fragility
of transmission. It’s the trauma of loss that the humanists
experienced. The loss of all that great ancient Greek literature
of which we are recovering so little. And so Gessner is listing, in fact, in the
Bibliotheca, lost works in the hopes that people will find them. So he’s got a complex view about printing. On the one hand, he sees printing as a divine
gift. “Today the art of typography, granted by God
to the men of our time for the preservation of letters to posterity, will supply authors
of every kind. By this art as much is produced in one day
by one man even unskilled in letters, as it was barely possible to produce in a whole
year by several men with the speediest quill.” Great stuff printing is. However, although the typographical art seems
to have been born for the conservation of books, most of the time nonetheless the silliness
of men and useless writings are edited, to the neglect of the old and better ones. For this reason we need libraries, and libraries
for manuscript books alone. In other words, we need a Houghton Library
in the middle of the 16th century. He is feeling that printing brings on his
its problem, this problem of overload, that the good books, by which he means the ancient
texts in new editions, are being swamped by cheaper bad books, less important books, silly
books. He is well aware, though, that printing can’t
survive without libraries. And actually Gessner knows that well enough
himself because in another of his works, he offers advice on how to index a book. He then offers you a collective index basically
of all the books in the bibliotheca. To index a book efficiently, you should own
two copies of it. And you should cut and paste out of the book
the passages that you want to index. You need two copies, so you can cut from the
recto and the verso of each page. Interestingly, he doesn’t talk about a third
copy, so you might be able to have something later on. And Gessner, in fact, does this. So here from his Nachlass is a work that was
prepared for publication after his death but never published. And so we have a manuscript. And you can see that it is made of slips of
paper glued in. Some of them are manuscripts in Gessner’s
hand. Some of them are letters sent to him. But you can see here two printed books, a
German one in the Gothic script and a Latin one. Now some of these items did not have commercial
value. When they are marked up with a red pencil
as this piece of manuscript is, it’s a printers copy being marked by the compositor and then
normally would have been discarded. So we can imagine Gessner, who hangs out at
the printers all the time preparing his own books, picking stuff off the cutting room
floor basically, finding the text of interest, and filing it in his cubbies, and then sort
it under headings. This is actually a thesaurus of practical
medicine of remedies sorted by disease. So Gessner knew well what might happen to
books. They could be used. So what you need then is libraries. He starts off his preface to Leonard Beckenstein
bemoaning the loss of library of Alexandria with its 700,000 volumes. These were scrolls, not necessarily whole
works, like the volumes eight books of Aristotle might each have been a scroll. And he also bemoans the loss of many other
lesser known libraries like the 30,000 books belonging to the grammarian Tyrannion or even
just the two books by Galen that Galen reported losing in a fire at the temple of peace. And Gessner goes on to lament recent losses
such as the pillaging of Buda, which occurred “in the memory of our fathers” in 1526, which
destroyed the great library formed there by Matthias Corvinus. And he exclaims, “but what now remains of
all these glorious libraries except an empty reputation? So many and such precious books in every philosophy
were gradually lost, some consumed by flames or the tumult of war, some by age itself corrupted
by worms or an unhealthy location, many dissipated by negligence and the hatred of barbarians
for learning.” His solution then is the Bibliotheca. “I have opened a way and given a great occasion
to others, by which the wealthy and the princes can establish libraries, which are necessary
for transmitting books to posterity.” So of course Gessner is writing to someone
who he hopes will take him up on this. He hopes that Leonard Beckenstein whom he
praises for his learning and his book collection will prove to be one of these great princes. As it happens, we don’t know much else about
him beyond Gessner’s dedications. We don’t know what happened to his library. But in fact, this personal dedication to one
man thanks to print also becomes an open call to everyone out there. And Gessner is very adept at using the public
nature of the printed book to thank people in dedications for sending him materials for
his various projects, manuscripts, images, information, specimens for his natural histories
in particular. And he encouraged further contributions tacitly
and even very explicitly with, for example in one of his prefaces, calling openly for
contributions from Scandinavia and Spain, in particular, on birds where he has too little
information, and telling you if you’re going to send him something, go to a merchant in
your town who visits the fairs of Frankfurt or Lyon, and they will find there someone
from Zurich who will bring me what you have sent. And send me what you want in return, and I
will send it back to you. So he’s really using print as a call for people
to contribute to his ongoing projects. But in one instance, I think Gessner is also
using a printed dedication to try and pressure the owner of a great library to share his
material. Diego Hurtado de Mendoza was a Spanish diplomat
who served as imperial ambassador to Venice and took advantage of this terrific location
to form a great library of rare Greek manuscripts, which he either purchased or had copied. And Gessner dedicates also in the same years
the Bibliotheca Universalis a new edition of his Lexicon Graeco latinum to Mendoza. And notice that on a title page he mentions
the dedication, which is quite unusual. In the dedication, he praises the man’s library,
explaining, “the learned Arnoldus Arlenius Paraxylus showed me the catalog of your Greek
collection. The greater part of the learned will soon
know that remarkable books are hiding in your library when they read mention of them in
my bibliotheca which I have just completed since your name is cited every time I knew
you owned a rare Greek book.” And so he also lists Mendoza’s library among
the sources. But he never got to see any of these books. It’s not clear that the dedicatee appreciated
the publicity. I found no further mention of Mendoza and
Gessner’s life or correspondence. And Mendoza’s library became property of the
King of Spain at his death in 1575. Gessner addresses other great owners of libraries,
typically to thank them for their generosity. Now why do I have this here? I’m not– OK, I don’t have slides of these. Basically, Gessner makes editio princeps of
Aelian’s Natural History, and he dedicated to Jakob Fugger thanking Fugger for the loan
of your very old Greek manuscript, which he clearly edited the work from. And he goes on to say, “welcome easily and
benevolently the return of your Aelian now complete, corrected, bilingual, and published,
and admitted into your library by the law of hospitality.” Similarly, he dedicated an edition of Dioscorides
in 1565 to the city of Augsburg, saying, “please add this volume to your library that ornament
to your city which was begun by you and which will grow in perpetuity.” So Gessner had high hopes for the preservation
of his own books by getting them placed in these very nice institutional libraries of
his time. Those libraries actually did serve well to
preserve their contents even though they moved around. The Duke of Bavaria purchased Fugger’s collection,
so it moved from Ausburg to Munich, for example, in the late 16th century. But by and large, these works have survived
well, and we are not aware of missing any works of Gessner’s, whether the lavish illustrated
folios, which of course, would have survived or these cheaper works here, which I show
as example. But Gessner’s works do not survive all in
one place, even in his hometown of Zurich. So what made possible my project of exhaustively
studying the paratext of his 65 publications was the fact that all but one of these 65
are digitized in PDF, scanned by one major European project or another, thanks especially
to Gessner’s standing as a famous scion of Zurich. And this brings me to my final point about
the future objects of libraries. Libraries are responsible for preserving not
only physical objects now but also their digital surrogates. And both are essential for the future of transmitting
to the next generation the treasures gathered by generations past. Digitization offers access across geographical
distance in powerful ways and promises a form of preservation and backup as long as resources
are devoted to maintaining them because they do require resources in addition to new kinds
of expertise. But digitizations are also no substitute for
the objects themselves. They’re convenient when you know what you’re
looking at. But to make good use of a digitization, you
first need experience with books themselves. And it’s only by coming into Houghton that
students can experience how the objects relate to their digitizations. They can see how a book is put together. They can try to figure out what’s going on
here with this typescript manuscript of Marguerite Yourcenar, the first woman admitted to the
Academie Francaise. And what’s happening is she has used scotch
tape to tape on corrections to her material. So the tape has aged. The little pieces of paper are slipping around. And the digitization gives you some sense
of this, but obviously, seeing the object itself is much more effective. A couple of caveats I learned about digitizations
from my Gessner project– we will always use digitizations, and we should use them. But we have to remember that a digital copy
is just one copy. It’s going to become the most convenient copy,
the most widely used copy. But this copy of Gessner’s Bibliotheca, which
is the only one digitized to my knowledge, is actually a very unique copy. It is Gessner’s own copy, Handexemplar, which
he has annotated on the one hand. But it turns out it actually is a bit of a
pre-print. It is a galley because inside here is a major
correction that was made at the very last minute. This is as compared to the widely disseminated
version. Gessner’s own copy, you see, has crossed out
this paragraph and substitutes this paragraph up here. And in this paragraph, he is critiquing a
recent edition by a Basel printer in no uncertain terms. And I think that his Zurich printer told him,
uh-uh. We are going to have some little discussion
of Serapio and of confusion of his name with other Johns and so forth. So it’s a reminder that the digital copy may
be particularly available, but it is just one copy. And you should make sure you know what you’re
dealing with. And if it’s a special copy, keep that in mind. Another feature of digitization is that it
often neglects things that don’t fit the format of the book. So Gessner wrote this in octavo on the variety
of languages Mithridates. Many copies have been digitized. None of them contain the fold out table at
the back even though the catalog record for the particular copy of digitized states the
table is present. Unfortunately, in Zurich, where I have a few
connections, the table isn’t present. So they would have gone to the trouble of
digitizing it. I don’t know anybody in Munich, but maybe
someone will give me a connection. And so this foldout is fantastic. I saw it at the Countway Library when I realized
the situation. That’s what made me realize it was going to
Countway to see this. It’s the Lord’s Prayer in 23 different languages. Also from the Countway Library is my realization
of something that really isn’t visible at all in this otherwise high quality digitization
of a medical dictionary where Gessner had a part. It was part of my corpus. And you can see here a page opening. You have a Latin dedication and then the Greek
text. It’s a piece by Hippocrates. Nothing comes to mind. If you look at the book itself, suddenly you
realize there are these two little stubs of paper and a little bit of ink on one of them. This is a cancel. The first two pages of book were different
originally. They were cut out, and two new sheets were
introduced– the title page and the dedication. And I just wouldn’t have noticed at all if
it hadn’t been for seeing the book itself. And of course, we can’t know what the original
dedication was. The new dedication does explain that the book
had been printed much earlier than it was sold, and probably the dedicatee, in the meantime,
no longer seemed appropriate. So it’s unlikely to have been really juicy
stuff. But nevertheless, once you know that there’s
a cancel here, you can actually see it in the changing font of that gathering here in
Roman and there in italic. But I’m not going to look at my PDF that closely. And so I really want the book to tell me about
this. So basically, I would just say at 75, Houghton
is a mature institution, bursting with books and people, but also young at heart, bustling
with activity, embracing the digital to improve interactions with the public, and invigorating
the appreciation of books at a time when our students are drawn to other media, a key partner
in our collective goal of interpreting and transmitting unique objects of cultural heritage
but also the expert knowledge from which future generations will, we hope, carry the project
forward. So I wish us all a long and productive future
and especially to the institution, which will outlive us all. Thank you. [APPLAUSE] I would normally ask Ann take questions, but
I’m going to use her availability, and I think that Houghton Library has even one more incentive
to ask you to come back for our reception, but I do want to thank her when we’re [INAUDIBLE]. [APPLAUSE]

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *